If this were true a few years ago I would be dead

Not even exaggerating, I wish I were.   If I had to wait three years between cancer screenings my children would be without their mother.  And even though I sometimes fantasize about the day after they leave for college turning their bedrooms into shoes closets, that would have been a senseless and avoidable tragedy.

Now they want to change the guidelines for pap screenings?  CNN article linked below with details.  Here's my story.

I was a no-risk woman.  In my 30s.  Monogamous.  Had already had kids.  No family history of female cancers.  Always got my annual oil change exams and screenings.  Never so much as an abnormal blip on lab results.

A few years ago, I got an abnormal pap.  Ok, I like to think myself logical, so before panic set in, I do what anyone else would, go online.  I look around and find out how incredibly normal an abnormal pap is.  Ok, the next step, re-test and chances are (like huge chances here) whatever caused the unknown abnormality would be gone and we’d move on to the next year’s exam.  Ok, not so much for me.  Came back abnormal still, my primary doc said, why don’t you head over to an ob/gyn to be safe.

Now a little nervous.

Having not needed an ob/gyn since 1995 I just picked the one across the hall from my primary doc.  Could not stand him, but if all I needed was a quick little biopsy for him to tell me not to worry, who cares, right?  Ok, not so much for me again.

Results came back questionable, he said let’s re-test in 3 months.  Hmm, ok, YOU wait three months, I’m close to a panic here AND you’re an ass, so moving on now.  One more doc, again, did not like her at all.  So, now I am looking around and interviewing doctors. 

I knew I was done using the parts, so IF there was a problem, not concerned about taking them out.  My concern was making sure I stayed around for my kids, to raise them, to watch them as adults, become parents themselves, you know all the stuff we’re supposed to do.

Found a doc I liked.  He was a DO, not an MD, so in theory would take more of a look at the whole Julie, not just the parts of his specialty.  So more of the same tests, more of the same results.  Not normal, not cancer and now, rapidly changes cells.  Toss in a few in-office procedures with the goal of just cutting out the affected parts of my cervix.  Yea, again, not so much for me.  Add in the bonus of not only rapidly changing cells, but more abnormalities the deeper thy got in the cervix.

So now doc says, probably time for a hysterectomy.  A little more panic here, a DO suggesting surgery carries a bit of weight to me.  We could spend time weighing pros and cons and the whole no more babies thing, but like I said before, we knew no more babies anyway.  So let’s just do this.

Surgery uneventful, so that’s good.  Got to keep ovaries, so that’s good for my family, no harsh jump into the land of menopause, just continuing my already started descent there.

Doc of course had all the removed parts sent for lab review.  And he said the abnormalities were not only my cervix, but all up in the uterus as well.  If left alone, it would have been one helluva cancer.  And he said we were not too far off from that reality.

Start to finish of this little story?  18 months.  Three year wait, I would have been dead.

New cervical cancer screening guidelines released - CNN.com

Previous Post

Silverlight 4 plus Dynamics CRM 4

Nov 18
Today at PDC Scott Guthrie announced not only loads of cool new features for Silverlight 4, but also the release today of the Beta. So, what in the world does that have to do with CRM? Glad that you asked....
Next Post

Rocky Mountain Tech Tri-fecta v2 registration now open

Dec 1
Are you looking for an excuse to come to Colorado? A business trip with an extra day to go play in the mountains? Yup, I thought so. February 27, 2010 we are hosting v2 of our all day FREE (imagine...


Jen Young

I hear you girl..and you would have been sorely missed too...it sucks that most of these people making the deiciosn for us WOMEN are MEN!!!

(No offense...love men...but you get the gist!)


-Jean Piaget believes that play is a process of assimilation has two characteristics:
-Assimilation of impressions and reactions during the game
The conclusion of the article "logic, genetics and sociology is that social life is a necessary condition of the individual development in its very nature, making it the state to pass state personalitate.El autistic sees cooperation as a general process of reason although individual differences are related with biological heredity in the sense that he could never raise the intelligence level of an individual, medium or even an important function assign debil.Piaget coordination and social adjustments saying that human intelligence is developed according to individual social interactions in general too neglected.
Piagetiana perspective can be characterized by three dominant traits:
-Biological dimension;
Subject-environmental factors-interactionism;
Psycho-genetic-constructivism.jocuri miniclip
Piaget classifies its genetic epistemology as "naturalistic without being positivist" and cognitive behaviors considered as a product of a body endowed with a structure that is manifested by their power of assimilation and accommodation.
Constructivism believes secvetele psycho-genetic development as regulated by some endogenous origin Balancing Mechanism, but not predetermined by hereditary factors in terms of content or complete balancing structures.
Genetic theory shed light on one factor which certain conceptions about learning not been granted any attention, that of self-regulating mechanisms or balancing.
Reproach brought fundamental concept and psycho-genetic system of Piaget's stage, beyond the variety of formulation seems to be this: too much trust in human nature against a visible indifferent toward "education power".
Russian psychologists have blamed some cantonare in Piaget's biological determinism, genetic and epi-genetic, which would not be allowed to see the great malleability and nondeterminismul fuindamental of psycho-genesis.jocuri h2o

machine a sous

My concern was verifying I stayed around for my youngsters to raise them, to check out them as adults wind up being people themselves you know each and every trace of the stuff we’re supposed to do.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)